Thomas Howard |
At Edward's death, Thomas supported Richard III's claim to the throne and carried the Sword of State at Richard's coronation and was rewarded with the Earldom of Surrey. When Richard III was killed at the Battle of Bosworth (along with Thomas's father, who was also a loyal supporter), Thomas was arrested and thrown in the tower. But a couple of years later, the new king, Henry Tudor (Henry VII), restored his earldom and eventually Thomas became one of the king's most trusted advisors. That seems to be a thing with kings and nobility, a lot of on-again, off-again relationships, depending on who is in power and who wants to be in power. Doesn't do a lot for building trust.
James IV |
Somewhere in the midst of all that activity, Thomas managed to marry, twice, and through these marriage became the grandfather of both Ann Boleyn and Catherine Howard, two of Henry VIII's six wives. It is through his son Edmund Howard that our family line continues.
Edmund Howard |
Sigh! I guess all the ancestors can't be heroic. In any case, Edmund's first wife was Joyce Culpepper, with whom he had three sons and three daughters, including Catherine Howard, who became Queen a year or so after her father's death. Our family is supposed to descend from Catherine's sister Margaret Howard (1515-1572), who married Sir Thomas Arundel of Wardour Castle.
Arms of Arundel |
Sir Matthew Arundel (1532-1598) held several administrative posts including Sheriff and was twice a member of Parliament, but for the most part, he kept to his estates in the west country, perhaps having learned a lesson about the dangers of hanging around at court. In 1559, her married Margaret Willoughby and they had several children, the eldest of whom was Thomas Arundel (1560-1639), through whom our family was said to continue.
Thomas married twice and through his second marriage to Ann Phillipson, our line is said to continue. Unfortunately, here is where Cousin Eleanor's research makes a wrong turn. To be fair, she isn't the only one who made this wrong turn.
Thomas and Ann had a son Matthew born about 1609. For many years, genealogists, including Maryland's own premier researcher, Harry Wright Newman, theorized that this Matthew Arundel emigrated to Virginia where he took the name Matthew Howard. It was an interesting assumption given Thomas's efforts at colonization. In 1939, though, another researcher turned up definitive proof that this was not the case. Thomas's son Matthew died in 1620 and was buried in London without ever crossing the Atlantic. Newman later updated his work in Anne Arundel Gentry to reflect this new information and thus deprive us of a direct link to this family.
Ann Arundel, Lady Baltimore |
Cecil Calvert, Lord Baltimore |
Just discovered your blog. Most of it could be my blog! I’m a retired Maryland girl and a life long genealogist and historian. I have the same descent from Edward l as you, as far as Fitzalan and then I veer off, but my ancestors settled in Southern Maryland in the 1600’s. I’d love to chat with you.
ReplyDeleteEllie Lewis
If you have ancestors in Southern Maryland, I'm sure we are somehow related. :-) Always happy to share info with a cousin. You can email me at scrivgen@comcast.net
DeleteSuper information and pictures! While searching for information on George Calvert, a surgeon, that died in 1642 and before that he owned land in Elizabeth City, VA, I discovered your post. What caught my eye in one of the google search results is the name Matthew Howard who is my 5th great grandfather. I'd hoped to find out more about him. I'm also researching the Tilney/Howard families. Your post is quite well-researched, but I'd like to see your sources if at all possible. Perhaps you have them listed online somewhere else? They may provide sources I'd like to explore. I do already have Henry Wright Newman's information. Thanks again! Beth
ReplyDeleteBeth, most of my sources for this are just standard internet stuff--wikipedia, google, etc. nothing very esoteric.
ReplyDelete